Lidl Apologises for Fines to Poppy Sellers at Supermarket Parking
Lidl Apologizes After Volunteers Fined for Selling Poppies
Supermarket chain Lidl has issued an apology after several volunteers who were selling poppies faced incorrect parking fines. The incident involved members of the Royal British Legion, who were reportedly fined between October 27 and November 9, despite their vehicles being registered with Lidl in North Hykeham.
One of those affected was Christine Emerson, a volunteer who described her shock upon receiving a £90 fine. She said she felt "knocked sideways" by the unexpected charge. Despite the financial burden, Ms. Emerson refused to pay the fine, stating it was "not right."
Ms. Emerson shared her experience with the BBC, explaining that she had not anticipated such a charge. "Considering nearly all of the people involved are pensioners, it was a bit of a kick in the teeth," she said. "I did get cross about it."
As a volunteer for the RBL North Hykeham, Ms. Emerson’s efforts were part of a tradition honoring her father and grandfather, both of whom fought in world wars. She expressed her determination to "rather fight it and go down fighting if necessary."


She is not the only one affected by this issue. Fellow volunteer Michael Cann was also upset after receiving a parking ticket. He criticized Lidl management for not addressing his concerns. Mr. Cann described himself as "absolutely furious" that someone had failed in their duties, emphasizing that their work was part of the national annual appeal for veterans.
Mr. Cann accused Lidl's management of being unresponsive, saying they "did not want to know anything about it." He also criticized Parkingeye, the company responsible for managing the parking, for making the process of appealing the charges unnecessarily complicated.
"When we tried to contact them, the phone number wasn't responsive, then they say you've got to email them or go on their website, which is a faff," he said.
According to reports from the BBC, Lidl confirmed that it had acted swiftly to address a "genuine mistake." The supermarket chain stated that "the Parking Charge Numbers to all number plates provided have now been cancelled, and one, which had already been paid, has been refunded."
A spokesperson for Parkingeye described its appeals process as "simple and accessible." They encouraged motorists to engage with the process to provide background and evidence on why they may have broken the rules of the car park. "It is only during engagement with the appeals process that personal and mitigating circumstances can be brought to light and fairness and understanding shown," the spokesperson added.
The spokesperson further confirmed that all charges related to the poppy sales by Mr. Cann and Ms. Emerson have been canceled.
Similar Cases Spark Public Outrage
This incident is not isolated. Other stories have emerged where individuals faced unjust parking fines due to various circumstances:
- Fury as lifesaver's plea rejected – A volunteer's parking fine saga sparked public outrage.
- How did an army veteran find himself fighting a staggering £200 fine over a broken parking ticket machine?
- Did a medical emergency lead to an unjust fine for a Nottinghamshire driver, sparking outrage over automated parking penalties?
- What costly lesson did Medway Council learn after a pensioner's relentless challenge on parking permit eligibility?
- How did a simple Tesco shop turn into a £70 parking fine nightmare for a Dorset family?
These cases highlight growing concerns about the fairness of parking enforcement and the need for more transparent and empathetic processes.